For those of you unfamiliar with Valero, it is
an independent oil company based in San
Antonio , TX . It owns 2 refineries, but no
oil fields - it buys all the oil it refines and processes via contract or
on the open market.
Its origin was as a public utility providing
natural gas to the city of San
Antonio , but
it has grown to be a significant gasoline retailer in a good portion of
the southeast and southwest, as well as a purveyor of natural
gas.
It is a significant economic force in Texas , even in light of the other
majors (Shell, Exxon Mobil, etc.) based in the state. This memo to
employees provides realistic insight into the economic importance of the
proposed XL pipeline.
Date: January 24,
2012
To: Valero
Employees
From: Bill
Klesse
Subject: Keystone XL Pipeline
Statement
As you know, the Obama
administration decided last week to deny TransCanada's application to ship
crude oil via the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to the Gulf Coast .
Valero has planned to be a shipper and purchaser of that oil since 2008,
and obviously we were disappointed in the decision. We issued a statement
in response to questions from the media, and I wanted to share it with you
in case you get questions from friends or business partners, and so that
you would know why Valero supports the Keystone XL pipeline. This is the
statement:
Despite the uncertainty and
political fighting over the Keystone XL pipeline, Valero has continued to
invest in its U.S. refining operation. In 2011 we
spent nearly $3 billion on projects, and for 2012 our capital expenditure
budget is over $3 billion. These expenditures are keeping our employees on
the job and putting additional people to work. To reference two of our
refineries, at Port Arthur , Texas , we have 1,600 contractors working on
an expansion project, and at St. Charles Parish, Louisiana , we have
another 1,000 contractors working on a separate project. We need this kind
of economic activity to accelerate to help all
Americans.
This illustrates why President
Obama's rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline is so absurd. There are
pipelines in every neighborhood all across America .
The administration's decision
was not about pipelines, it was about the misguided beliefs that Canadian
oil sands development should be stopped and that fossil fuel prices should
increase to make alternative energy more attractive. Instead, we should be
impressed with how well the oil sands engineering and recovery technology
has advanced, and the economic benefits this development brings. Having
more oil available in the marketplace has the potential to lower prices
for consumers. As an independent refiner, Valero buys all of the oil we
process. Due to the administrations misguided policies, refiners like
Valero will have to buy more oil from other sources outside the U.S. and Canada . Consumers will bear the
additional shipping cost, not to mention the additional greenhouse gas
emissions and political
risks.
With all the issues facing our country, it is
absolutely unbelievable our federal government says no to a company like
TransCanada that is willing to spend over $7 billion and put Americans to
work on a pipeline. The administration's decision throws dirt into the
face of our closest ally and largest trading
partner.
The point above is that it is
not about pipelines as many pipelines cross the Ogallala Aquifer, in
the Great
Plains region, and,
in fact, there is already significant oil and gas production in the area
covered by the aquifer. This is politics at its
worst.
Thank you for your
support.
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment