Saturday, July 21, 2012

THE STATS

There are actually two messages here.  The first is very interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.
 
            A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.
 
Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
 
             U.S.                    65% 
             England               46% 
             Canada                42% 
           
Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:
 
             U.S.                     93% 
             England                15% 
             Canada                 43%
 
 Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
 
             U.S.                     90% 
             England                15% 
             Canada                 43%
 
Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
 
             U.S.                     77% 
             England                40% 
             Canada                 43%
 
Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
 
             U.S.                     71 
             England                14 
             Canada                18
 
Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":
 
             U.S.                   12% 
             England              2% 
             Canada               6%
 
            And now for the last statistic:
 
            National Health Insurance?
 
             U.S.                  NO 
             England             YES 
             Canada              YES
 
            Check this last set of statistics!!
 
The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
 
You know what the private business sector is. A real-life business, not a Government job.  Here are the percentages.
 
            T. Roosevelt................... 38% 
            Taft............................... 40% 
             Wilson ......................... 52% 
            Harding.......................... 49% 
            Coolidge........................  48% 
            Hoover..................... ..... 42% 
            F. Roosevelt...................  50% 
            Truman........................... 50% 
            Eisenhower....................   57% 
            Kennedy.........................  30% 
            Johnson..........................  47% 
            Nixon.............................. 53% 
            Ford................................ 42% 
            Carter............................. 32% 
            Reagan............................ 56% 
            GH Bush.........................  51% 
             Clinton .......................... 39% 
            GW Bush......................... 55% 
            Obama..........................  8%
 
     This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:  only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
 
      That's right!  Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!  And these people are trying to tell our big Corporations how to run their business?
 
      How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one?  Or about jobs when he has never really had one?  And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia, Government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers." They should have been in an employment line.
 
   Pass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media.
 
            "One of the penalties of not participating in politics is that you will be governed by your inferiors." Plato
 
  Please vote this November!!

Thursday, July 19, 2012

REMEMBER THIS?

Yes, he told us in advance what he planned to do.  Few were listening.......

From Sunday's 07 Sept. 2008, 11:48:04 EST,  Televised "Meet the Press" the then Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag. General Bill Ginn, USAF (ret.), asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.  The General stated to Obama that according to the  United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171..
 
During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention, facing the flag, with the right hand over the heart.  Or, at the very least, "Stand and Face It".

NOW GET THIS !!

'Senator' Obama replied:

"As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides....."  "There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression...."  "The anthem itself conveys a war-like message.  You know, the bombs bursting in air, and all that sort of thing."
Obama continued:, "The National Anthem should be 'swapped' for something less parochial and less bellicose.  I like the song 'I'd Like To Teach the World To Sing.'   If that were our anthem, then I might salute it.   In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as 'redesign' our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love.  It's my intention, if elected, to disarmAmerica to the level of acceptance to our  Middle East    Brethren.   If we, as a Nation of warring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails - - - perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments ......"
"When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts . We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice, which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag, and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past."

"Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside.  I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path.  My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country's First black Family.  Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America."
 
 

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

ODDS ARE...

A Las Vegas "odds maker" opines on why Obama will get beat by Romney in November. Interesting analysis and only a minute or so to read. Root's a smart guy – Best analysis I have seen thus far

Wayne Allyn Root
May 30, 2012
Townhall Alerts
Sign-Up
Most political predictions are made by biased pollsters, pundits, or prognosticators who are either rooting for Republicans or Democrats. I am neither. I am a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee, and a well-known Vegas oddsmaker with one of the most accurate records of predicting political races.

But as an oddsmaker with a pretty remarkable track record of picking political races, I play no favorites. I simply use common sense to call them as I see them. Back in late December I released my New Years Predictions. I predicted back then-before a single GOP primary had been held, with Romney trailing for months to almost every GOP competitor from Rick Perry to Herman Cain to Newt-that Romney would easily rout his competition to win the GOP nomination by a landslide. I also predicted that the Presidential race between Obama and Romney would be very close until election day. But that on election day Romney would win by a landslide similar to Reagan-Carter in 1980.

Understanding history, today I am even more convinced of a resounding Romney victory. 32 years ago at this moment in time, Reagan was losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls. So why do most pollsters give Obama the edge?

First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient-common sense. Here is my gut instinct. Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now-and that is a bad harbinger.

Now to an analysis of the voting blocks that matter in U.S. politics:
*Black voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. His endorsement of gay marriage has alienated many black church-going Christians. He may get 88% of their vote instead of the 96% he got in 2008. This is not good news for Obama.

*Hispanic voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. If Romney picks Rubio as his VP running-mate the GOP may pick up an extra 10% to 15% of Hispanic voters (plus lock down Florida). This is not good news for Obama.

*Jewish voters. Obama has been weak in his support of Israel. Many Jewish voters and big donors are angry and disappointed. I predict Obama's Jewish support drops from 78% in 2008 to the low 60’s. This is not good news for Obama.

*Youth voters. Obama’s biggest and most enthusiastic believers from 4 years ago have graduated into a job market from hell. Young people are disillusioned, frightened, and broke- a bad combination. The enthusiasm is long gone. Turnout will be much lower among young voters, as will actual voting percentages. This not good news for Obama.

*Catholic voters. Obama won a majority of Catholics in 2008. That won’t happen again. Out of desperation to please women, Obama went to war with the Catholic Church over contraception. Now he is being sued by the Catholic Church. Majority lost. This is not good news for Obama.

*Small Business owners.Because I ran for Vice President last time around, and I'm a small businessman myself, I know literally thousands of small business owners. At least 40% of them in my circle of friends, fans and supporters voted for Obama 4 years ago to “give someone different a chance.” I warned them that he would pursue a war on capitalism and demonize anyone who owned a business...that he’d support unions over the private sector in a big way...that he'd overwhelm the economy with spending and debt. My friends didn’t listen. Four years later, I can't find one person in my circle of small business owner friends voting for Obama. Not one. This is not good news for Obama.

*Blue collar working class whites. Do I need to say a thing? White working class voters are about as happy with Obama as Boston Red Sox fans feel about the New York Yankees. This is not good news for Obama.

*Suburban moms. The issue isn’t contraception…it’s having a job to pay for contraception. Obama’s economy frightens these moms. They are worried about putting food on the table. They fear for their children’s future. This is not good news for Obama.

*Military Veterans. McCain won this group by 10 points. Romney is winning by 24 points. The more our military vets got to see of Obama, the more they disliked him. This is not good news for Obama.

Add it up. Is there one major group where Obama has gained since 2008? Will anyone in America wake up on election day saying “I didn’t vote for Obama 4 years ago. But he’s done such a fantastic job, I can’t wait to vote for him today.” Does anyone feel that a vote for Obama makes their job more secure?
Forget the polls. My gut instincts as a Vegas odds maker and common sense small businessman tell me this will be a historic landslide and a world-class repudiation of Obama’s radical and risky socialist agenda. It's Reagan-Carter all over again.

But I’ll give Obama credit for one thing-he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

STUFF IT

Best explanation of what is happening in America that I have heard! Please pass this on, it may actually make folks think!

CAN THE USA SURVIVE GIVEN THE FOLLOWING?

The folks who are getting free stuff, don't like the folks who are paying for  the free stuff,  because the folks who are paying for the free stuff can no longer afford to pay for both the free stuff and their own stuff.

The folks who are paying for the free stuff want the free stuff to stop, and the folks who are getting the free stuff   want even more free stuff on top of the free stuff they are already  getting!

Now... The people  who are forcing the people to pay for the free stuff have told the people who are RECEIVING the free stuff, that the people who are PAYING for the free stuff, are being mean, prejudiced.

So... The people who are GETTING the free stuff have been convinced they need to hate the people who are paying for the free stuff by the people who are forcing some people to pay for their free stuff, and giving them the free stuff in the first place.

We have let the free stuff giving go on for so long that there are now more people getting free stuff than paying for the free stuff.

Now understand this. All great democracies have  committed financial  suicide   somewhere between 200 and 250 years after being founded. The reason?   The voters figured out they could vote themselves money from the treasury by electing people who promised to give them money from the treasury in exchange for electing them. 

Thomas Jefferson said it best: "The democracy (Republic) will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."

The United States  officially became a Republic in 1776,  235 years ago . The number of people now getting free stuff outnumbers the people paying for the free stuff. We have one chance to change that... on Nov 6th, 2012 . Failure to change that spells the end of the United States as we know it.

ELECTION 2012 IS COMING
A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!

I'M 100% for PASSING THIS ON!!!

Let's take a stand!!!

Obama: Gone!
Borders : Closed!
Language : English only
Culture :  Constitution, and the Bill of Rights!
Drug  Free :  Mandatory Drug Screening before Welfare!
NO freebies to: Non-Citizens!

We the people are coming!
Only 86% will send this on. Should be 100%. What will you do?

Monday, July 16, 2012

BETTER THAN A STOCK TRADE?

 

Sally was driving home from one of her business trips in Northern Arizona when she saw an elderly Navajo woman walking on the side of the road.  As the trip was a long and quiet one, she stopped the car and asked the Navajo woman if she would like a ride.
With a silent nod of thanks, the woman got into the car..
Resuming the journey, Sally tried in vain to make a bit of small talk with the Navajo woman. The old woman just sat silently, looking intently at everything she saw, studying every little detail, until she noticed a brown bag on the seat next to
Sally.

"What in bag?" she muttered.
Sally looked down at the brown bag and said, "It's a bottle of wine. I got it for my husband."
The Navajo woman was silent for another moment or two. Then speaking with the quiet wisdom of an elder, she said:


"Good trade....."